Enhancing operational planning at the tactical level: Application of the fuzzy DIBR II – TOPSIS model for selecting a maneuver form in offensive urban operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10031122025zKeywords:
urban offensive operations, fuzzy Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II (DIBR II), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), form of maneuver, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)Abstract
Modern military operations are characterized by high dynamism and uncertainty, requiring rapid decision-making that takes into consideration numerous complex factors. Urban offensive operations, in particular, present unique challenges due to dense terrain, the presence of civilians, and the dynamic nature of combat. Selecting the optimal form of maneuver is a critical component in developing a course of action (COA) and requires the balancing of multiple, often conflicting, criteria. This paper presents a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model that integrates the DIBR II (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods to support decision-making at the tactical level. DIBR II is used to determine the relative importance of criteria, while TOPSIS identifies the most suitable form of maneuver based on proximity to an ideal solution. The model is applied to a simulated urban operation scenario, evaluating maneuver forms against expert-defined criteria. This approach reduces subjectivity and enhances decision efficiency by providing a transparent and replicable framework. Universal criteria for maneuver selection, as proposed by military experts, are incorporated. Beyond maneuver selection, the model demonstrates potential applicability to other aspects of operational planning, such as risk assessment and target prioritization.
Downloads
References
ADP 3-90: Offense and defense. (2019). Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
Aleksić, A., Jokić, Ž., Živković, M., Radovanović, M., & Tošić, S. (2025). Application of the DIBR II–fuzzy MABAC model for shooting stance selection. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 5(1), 202–218.
Ardil, C. (2019). Fighter aircraft selection using Technique fo0r Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution with multiple criteria decision making analysis. Engineering and Technology International Journal of Transport and Vehicle Engineering, 13(10), 649-657.
ATP 3-06 / MCTP 12-10B: Urban operations. (2022). Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.
ATP 3-06.11: Brigade combat team urban operations. (2024). Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
Bojanic, D., Kovač, M., Bojanic, M., & Ristic, V. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making in a defensive operation of the guided anti-tank missile battery: An example of the hybrid model fuzzy AHP - MABAC. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(1), 51–66
Božanić, D., & Pamucar, D. (2023). Overview of the Method Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II and Its Application in Multi-criteria Decision-Making. In: Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., Yazdani, M., & Panchal, D. (Eds.), Computational Intelligence for Engineering and Management Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 984 (pp. 863-873). Singapore: Springer.
Božanić, D., Epler, I., Puška, A., Biswas, S., Marinković, D., & Koprivica, S. (2024). Application of the DIBR II–rough MABAC decision-making model for ranking methods and techniques of lean organization systems management in the process of technical maintenance. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 22(1), 101–123.
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Churchman, C. W., & Ackoff, R. L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 2(1), 172–187.
Dağıstanlı, H. A. (2025). Weapon system selection for capability-based defense planning using Lanchester models integrated with fuzzy MCDM in computer assisted military experiment. Knowledge and Decision Systems With Applications, 1, 11–23.
FM 3-0: Operations. (2022). Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
FM 3-90: Tactics. (2023). Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
FM 5-0: Planning and orders production. (2024). Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
Hamurcu, M., & Eren, T. (2020). Selection of unmanned aerial vehicles by using multicriteria decision-making for defence. Journal of Mathematics, 2020, 4308756.
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Application: A State of the Art Survey. New York: Springer.
Instructions for operational planning and work of commands in the Serbian Army (only in Serbian: Uputstvo za operativno planiranje i rad komandi u Vojsci Srbije). (2017). Belgrade: General Staff of the Serbian Armed Forces.
Jokić, Ž., Božanić, D., & Pamučar, D. (2021). Selection of fire position of mortar units using LBWA and fuzzy MABAC model. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4(1), 115–135.
Karavidić, Z., & Projović, D. (2018). A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model in the security forces operations based on rough sets. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(1), 97–120.
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451.
Kiratsoudis, S., & Tsiantos, V. (2025). Strategic modeling innovations: Enhancing military decision-making through advanced entropy-based multi-criteria analysis and comprehensive evaluation. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129251326915.
Land Army Doctrine (Only in Serbian: Doktrina Kopnene vojske). (2012). Belgrade: Media Center „Odbrana“.
Maathuis, C., & Ambtman, L. (2025). Fuzzy AHP model for courses of action comparison in military operations. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS 2025) (pp. 204–213). Williamsburg: William & Mary Law School.
Pamučar, D. S., & Dimitrijević, S. R. (2021). Multiple-criteria model for optimal anti-tank ground missile weapon system procurement. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 69(4), 792–827.
Pamučar, D. S., Božanić, D. I., & Kurtov, D. V. (2016). Fuzzification of the Saaty’s scale and a presentation of the hybrid fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS model: An example of the selection of a Brigade Artillery Group firing position in a defensive operation. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 64(4), 966–986.
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016–3028.
Pamučar, D., Vasin, Lj., & Lukovac, L. (2014). Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL–MARICA model. In Proceedings of the XVI International Scientific-Expert Conference on Railways RAILCON 2014 (pp. 89–92). Niš: University of Niš, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering.
Petrović, I., & Milenković, M. (2024). Improvement of the operations planning process using a hybridized fuzzy-multi-criteria decision-making approach. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 72(3), 1093–1119.
Radovanović, M., Živković, M., & Crnogorac, M. (2025). Application of decision-making support model in the operations planning process at the tactical level. Vojenské rozhledy, 34(1), 85–103.
Ryan, T. R., Jr. (2022). Warfighting: A function of combat power. Military Review, 102(5), 61–70.
Slavković, R. V., Šipka, B. B., & Jukić, J. K. (2018). Manevar u napadnoj operaciji snaga kopnene vojske. Vojno delo, 70(2), 277–297.
Swethaa, S., & Felix, A. (2023). An intuitionistic dense fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS method for military robot selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 44(4), 6749–6774.
Tešić, D. Z., Božanić, D. I., & Puška, A. (2024a). Application of multi-criteria decision making for the selection of a location for crossing a water obstacle by fording in a defense operation. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 72(3), 1120–1146.
Tešić, D., & Božanić, D. (2023). Optimizing military decision-making: Application of the FUCOM–EWAA–COPRAS-G MCDM model. Acadlore Transactions on Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 1(3), 148–160.
Tešić, D., & Marinković, D. (2023). Application of Fermatean fuzzy weight operators and MCDM model DIBR–DIBR II–NWBM–BM for efficiency-based selection of a complex combat system. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 243–256.
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2024b). Enhancing multi-criteria decision-making with fuzzy logic: An advanced Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked II method incorporating triangular fuzzy numbers. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 3(1), 56–67.
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Radovanović, M., & Petrovski, A. (2023a). Optimising assault boat selection for military operations: An application of the DIBR II–BM–CoCoSo MCDM model. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 2(4), 160–171.
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., & Milić, A. (2023b). A multi-criteria decision-making model for pontoon bridge selection: An application of the DIBR II–NWBM–FF MAIRCA approach. Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 2(4), 212–223.
The doctrine of operations of the Serbian Armed Forces (Only in Serbian: Doktrina operacija Vojske Srbije). (2012). Belgrade: General Staff of the Serbian Armed Forces - Media Center „Odbrana“.
Yıldızbaşı, A., & Gür, L. (2020). A decision support model for unmanned aerial vehicles assisted disaster response using AHP–TOPSIS method. European Journal of Science and Technology, (20), 56–66.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Živković, M., Radovanović, M., & Božanić, D. (2025). Application of the DIBR II–TOPSIS hybrid model in the selection of a form of manoeuvre in urban offensive operations. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Military Sciences “VojNa 2025” (pp. 61–71). Belgrade: Military Academy.
Žnidaršič, V., Dojić, K. V., & Milić, N. L. (2024). Selection of landing site for infantry river crossing using aluminum boat M70: Application of DIBR and TOPSIS method. International Conference The Knowledge-Based Organization, 30(1), 193–200. Sibiu: Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Miša Živković, Ilija Stojanović, Aleksandar Aleksić
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the 