A fuzzy extension of MEREC method using parabolic measure and its applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10020042023nKeywords:
MEREC, fuzzy MEREC, fuzzy TOPSIS, Stock portfolio selection, MCDMAbstract
Human qualitative judgments are often characterized by uncertainty and predictability. Decision-makers tend to be more confident in making linguistic decisions than in crisp value judgments. MEREC is capable of achieving relative objective weights of several conflicting criteria. This paper contains two parts, first, the extension of MEREC method in fuzzy circumstances based on linguistic terms in which a parabolic measure has been used to calculate the overall performance of alternatives as it is able to work according the definition of TFNs and to show the applicability, a simple decision matrix is analysed in a fuzzy environment. Second, a new hybrid ranking methodology Fuzzy MEREC-TOPSIS for multi criteria decision making. Further, to illustrate the credibility and effectiveness of the proposed hybrid ranking method, a real-world example of stock selection has been used. The portfolio is constructed using ranking of the stocks received through the proposed method and capital is allocated according to the order of preference of stocks. To validate the proposed ranking model, the next 30 days closing price of each stock is predicted by a deep recurrent neural network and the portfolio for future investments is analysed. The results of the future analysis validate the credibility of the portfolio.
Downloads
References
Balioti, V., Tzimopoulos, C., & Evangelides,C. (2018). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using TOPSIS Method Under Fuzzy Environment. Application in Spillway Selection. Proceedings. 637.
Benayoun, R., Roy, B., & Sussman, N. (1996). Manual de, du programme ELECTRE. Note Synth. Form. 25
Carlsson, C., & Fuller, R. (2001). On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 122(2), 315-326.
Chen, C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9.
Chen, C.T., & Hung, W.Z. (2009). A New Decision-Making Method for Stock portfolio Selection Based on Computing with Linguistic Assessment. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 2009, 897024.
Chen, N., Xu, Z. (2015). Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: a new way to handle multi-criteria decision-making problems. Information Sciences, 292, 175-197,
Chen, Tung, C., Lin, C.T., & Huang, S.F. (2006). A Fuzzy Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.
Degdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kilinc, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert systems with Applications, 36, 8143-8151.
Diakoulaki, D., George M., & Lefteris P. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
Duckstein, L., & Opricovic, S. (1980). Multiobjective optimization in river basin development. Water Resources Research, 16(1), 14-20.
Gani, N. (2012). Anew Operation On Triangular Fuzzy Number For Solving Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 6(2), 525-532.
Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 525.
Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2015). Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective. Applied Energy, 158, 390-402.
Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based System, 121, 23–31.
Haseli, G., Sheikh, R., & Sana, S.S. (2019). Base-criterion on multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. International journal of management science and engineering management, 15(2), 79-88.
Huang, J., Zhang, T., Wang, X., & Liao, Z. (2013). TOPSIS Based on the Triangular Fuzzy Function and Its Application in Construction Scheme Optimization. International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD). IEEE.
Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press.
Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E., K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243-58.
Lu, J., Zhang, G., & Ruan, D. (2008). Intelligent multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making for situation assessments. Soft Computing, 12(3), 289-299.
Narang, M., Joshi, M. C., & Pal, A. K. (2021). A hybrid Fuzzy COPRAS-Base-Criterion Method for Multi-criteria Decision Making. Soft Computing, 25(13), 8391-8399.
Narang, M., Joshi, M. C., Bisht, K., & Pal, A. K. (2022). Stock portfolio selection using a new decision making approach based on the integration of fuzzy COCOSO with Heronian mean operator. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(1), 1-25.
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rao, C., Goh, M., & Zheng, J. (2017). Decision Mechanism for Supplier Selection Under Sustainability. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(01), 87-115.
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.
Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.
Saaty, L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T., L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications.
Satty, T., L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publication.
Singh, S. S. (2020). Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management of Top 10 Stocks Picks in India Amid Market Turmoil in COVID-19. International Journal of Science and Research, 9(7), 1938-1945.
Thakur, G.S.M., Bhattacharyya, R., & Sarkar, S. (2018). Stock portfolio selection using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Journal of King Saud University- Computer and Information Sciences, 30, 223-235.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2013). Multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study. Springer Science & Business Media.
Yoon, K. (1987). A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(3), 277-286.
Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.
Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. & Kvederytė, N. (2001). Multivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of building life cycle. Informatica, 12(1), 169–188.
Zavadskas, E., K., Kaklauskas, A., & Šarka, V. (1994). The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 3, 131-139.
Zeleny, M., & Cochrane, J.L. (1973). Multiple-scriteria decision making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2015). Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 26, 42-56.
Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2014). Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for sustainability. Sustainability, 6(1), 217-235.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the 