Non-linear programming model proposal for mutual support distance of air defence systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10013102024tKeywords:
mutual support distance of air defence systems, air defence systems features, deployment of air defence systems, non-linear programmingAbstract
With the advancements in technology, the deployment of air defence systems required for the defence of a country after procurement is considered as an important problem in terms of defence effectiveness. It is seen that criteria such as coverage, strike effectiveness and logistics network are taken into account while deploying. In addition, principles such as remote countermeasures, defence in depth and all-round defence are also taken into account. In this study, two different deployment models are proposed for point and area air defence. In this model, the optimum deployment distance at which other systems can support each other in addition to a deployed air defence system is determined. In the nonlinear target programming model proposed for point air defence, the number of missiles is considered to be reasonably balanced for perimeter defence, while for area defence, the nonlinear optimization problem is addressed by calculating the equally important coverage and strike effectiveness criteria values. In this study, it is observed that the approach based on mutual support distance has been used for the first time in the defence literature. According to the results obtained, it is observed that this proposed model for determining the mutual support distance solves the deployment problem optimally.
Downloads
References
Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-01 Counterair Operations. (2023). US Air Force. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-01/3-01-AFDP-COUNTERAIR.pdf, Accessed 3 September 2024.
Brown, G., Carlyle, M., Diehl, D., Kline, J., & Wood, K. (2005). A Two-Sided Optimization for Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. Operations Research, 53(5), 745-763.
Franklin, R., Ray, C. K., & Mehta, S. (1994). Geometric Algorithms for Siting of Air Defense Missile Batteries. Troy: Rensselær Polytechnic Institute.
Ghose, D., Prasad, U. R., & Guruprasad, K. (1993). Missile battery placement for air defense: A dynamic programming approach, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 17(9), 450-458.
Ignizio, J. P., & Shannon, R. E. (1972). Deployment of radars in air defense simulations. In P. Brock (Ed.), The Mathematics oflarge-Scale Simulation. La Jolla: Simulation Councils Inc.
Karasakal, O. (2008). Air defense missile-target allocation models for a naval task group. Computers & Operations Research, 35(6), 1759-1770.
Lee, J.-Y., & Kwak, K.-H. (2008). The Optimal Allocation Model for SAM Using Multi-Heuristic Algorithm: Focused on Theater Ballistic Missile Defense. IE Interfaces, 21(3), 262-273.
Lee, S.-H., & Baek, J.-U. (2005). Efficient Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Optimal Allocation of Additive SAM-X Weapon System. IE Interfaces, 18(4), 370-381.
Lötter, D.P., & van Vuuren J.H. (2016). A tri-objective, dynamic weapon assignment model for surface-based air defence. ORiON, 32(1), 1-22.
Martin Leibowitz, M. L., &.; Lieberman, G. J. (1960). Optimal Composition and Deployment of a Heterogeneous Local Air-Defense System, Operations Research, 8(3), 324-337.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017). USA White House. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf, Accessed 3 September 2024.
Özdemir, Z. (2019). Multi-purpose deployment model for regional air defence. Master Thesis. Ankara: Başkent University.
Özyılmaz Çopur, D. A (2022). Multıcrıterıa Approach For Confıguratıon And Posıtıonıng of Air Defense Systems. Master Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
Pant, M., & Deep, K. (2006). Building a Better Air Defence System Using Genetic Algorithms. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (Eds.) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 951-959), Vol. 4251. Berlin: Springer.
Petrov, Z. (2019). Key Aspects And Analysıs Of European Defense Plannıng Processes. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 5(15), 1238-1250.
Pietkiewicz, T., Kawalec, A., & Wajszczyk, B. (2018a). Heuristic Method of Air Defense Planning for an Area Object with the Use of Very Short Range Air Defense. In Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Technologies 2017. IDT 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (pp. 228-235), Vol. 72. Cham: Springer.
Pietkiewicz, T., Kawalec, A., & Wajszczyk, B. (2018b). An Optimization Problem of Air Defense Planning for an Area Object. In Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Technologies 2017. IDT 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (pp. 236-245). Vol. 72. Cham: Springer.
Tanergüçlü, T., Maraş, H., Gencer, C., & Aygüneş, H. (2012). A Decision Support System for Locating Weapon and Radar Positions in Stationary Point Air Defence. Information Systems Frontiers, 14, 423-444.
Taşdemir, S. (2021). Multi-Criteria Approaches for Deployment Location Selection of Point Air Defence Systems. Master Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the 